|
1
|
- A Presentation by Nicholas Johnson
- To FAIR’s “After the Flood” Program
- September 9, 2008
|
|
2
|
- this is a presentation by Nicholas Johnson
- who is not a Johnson County employee
- Harry L. Graves, Director
- Johnson County Conservation Board
- Wants me to make clear
- That I am in no way speaking for him
- So . . .
- “I am not”
|
|
3
|
- Iowa ranks near last in
- Park and recreation land
- Forests, wetlands, prairies, wildlife preserves
- Hopefully we’ll pass $20 million bond issue
- This presentation recommends
- We need 30-50-year plan that
- Puts new land for conservation in
- Greenbelts and Greenways, thereby
- Virtually eliminating economic losses from floods
- In addition to providing recreational, other benefits
|
|
4
|
- A “Greenbelt” and a . . .
- Greenbelts are rings of open land encircling an urban area, serving to
provide
- recreation: hiking and biking, golf, camping and picnics, hunting and
fishing, bird watching
- wildlife preservation, farming and wetlands
- A cost-saving constraint on urban sprawl
- . . . “Greenway”?
- Greenways are linear strips of land, often along rivers, in
floodplains, providing the benefits of Greenbelts plus fewer floods of
less severity – eliminating economic loss
- .
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- San Francisco Greenbelt Alliance
- http://www.greenbelt.org/
- http://youtube.com/watch?v=GpCO1cSYWg8
|
|
8
|
- London
- Birmingham
- Cambridge
- Bristol
- Reading
|
|
9
|
- England
- 13% of Johnson County = 32,000 acres
- San Francisco
- 27% of Johnson County = 67,000 acres
|
|
10
|
- Central Park Was a
- tough political decision
- Cost: $50 million –
- a lot 150 years ago
- Today’s value? $500 billion – one-half trillion!
- What will our Greenbelt be worth in 150 years?
- Never a cheaper time to acquire Greenbelt than now
|
|
11
|
- It’s elected official’s dream!
- My GO IOWA! Web site lists
- over 100 organizations
- Land trusts
- Conservation organizations
- Hunting and fishing
- enthusiasts,
- hikers and bikers (Crowds at your
rallies)
- Wildlife supporters; bird watchers
- Your supporters will include: young and old; liberals and
conservatives; high school dropouts and Ph.D.s; rich and poor;
Unitarians and conservative evangelicals; business and labor unions;
farmers and realtors; Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians . . .
|
|
12
|
- Hawkeye Wildlife Area
- Coralville Lake
- Lake McBride Park
- Kent Park
- Redbird Wildlife Area
- . . . More
- Credit: Iowa Sportsman’s Atlas
|
|
13
|
- That’s one I’ll leave to the expert judgment of the professionals
- Wherever it’s located your grandchildren and great grandchildren will
sing your praises
- As Larry the Cable Guy says, let’s just “Get ‘er done!”
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- It’s easy. There are only three rules:
- 1. Don’t put businesses or homes in floodplains
- 2. Don’t put businesses or homes in floodplains
- 3. Don’t put businesses or homes in floodplains
- Period
|
|
16
|
- Recreation areas anyway for
- Walking and biking trails
- Softball fields and Frisbee golf
- Picnicking and camping
- Open areas for
- Prairies and pasture
- Nature preserves and wetlands
- Why put them on bluffs, and
- build our homes and businesses on the river bank?
|
|
17
|
- Recreation areas are more attractive
- There are fewer floods (absorption of 5 inch rain)
- Those that occur are less severe
- They come on more slowly
- They cause businesses and homes zero economic damage
- How can this be??!!
|
|
18
|
- Homes, businesses, roads and parking lots:
- Suffer economic losses
- They cannot absorb rainfall
- They increase, and speed up, run off
- Creating more, and more severe, floods
- Thereby increasing owners’ economic losses
|
|
19
|
- No more public money for public structures
- Immediately stop all repair, rebuilding or new construction
- Immediately start using available land for recreation, flood control
- Modify zoning, utilize incentives, to encourage movement of structures
|
|
20
|
- Designate rivers’ floodplain areas
- Create 30-50-year plan for creation
- Optimize use of available floodplains now
- Acquire new plots within them
- Support the $20 million bond proposal
- Utilize all available and alternative programs
- Create ongoing working committees
|